← Back to Blog
RISC-V Development

Micro Magic MagicV: A 5 GHz, 13,000 CoreMark 64-bit RISC-V Core Running Linux, Zephyr and FreeRTOS

Micro Magic MagicV RISC-V IP CoreMark 16nm Zephyr FreeRTOS low power

Published: 2026-09-02 | Category: RISC-V Development | Reading time: ~5 min

On 31 August 2026, Sunnyvale-based Micro Magic, Inc. announced general availability of its MagicV family of 64-bit RISC-V processor cores, demonstrating a multi-core configuration running Linux, Zephyr, and FreeRTOS.

The label matters from the outset: every performance figure below is vendor-stated in the company's press release. No independent measurement, third-party benchmark, or published silicon has been offered alongside them. Read the numbers as a claim of record, not a verified result.

The performance claims, as stated

Micro Magic states:

If those numbers hold up on silicon, the interesting one is not 5 GHz — it is 11,000 CoreMarks at 200 mW. Roughly 55 CoreMarks per milliwatt per core would put 4-core server, automotive, and handset configurations inside a thermal envelope that most out-of-order 64-bit designs cannot reach without active cooling.

Why the operating voltage story matters more than the clock

The press release quotes two operating points: 1.1 V for maximum frequency, and 0.8 V for the efficiency point. That second number is the one with engineering consequence.

Dropping from 1.1 V to 0.8 V on the same core costs roughly 1,800 CoreMarks and 750 MHz, but takes power down to 200 mW. For anyone designing battery-powered or passively cooled equipment, that is the trade space that matters: a 64-bit core with hardware floating point that stays useful at 0.8 V means vector workloads and full Linux userspace become viable in form factors that previously had to drop to 32-bit microcontrollers.

Micro Magic also claims 10 mW at 1 GHz for the ultra-low-power core in the same family. A 1 GHz 64-bit core at 10 mW would compete directly with the power envelope of high-end 32-bit MCU subsystems, while retaining a flat 64-bit address space and an MMU-capable software stack.

Software: three operating systems, demonstrated on multicore

The announcement states that Linux, Zephyr, and FreeRTOS all run on MagicV processors, demonstrated in a multi-core configuration.

That combination is the practical minimum for a core intended to span the market list Micro Magic gives — automotive, cell phones, rack-mount servers, and watches. Linux covers the application and server end; Zephyr covers connected embedded and RTOS-class work; FreeRTOS covers the deeply embedded and certified-control end. Having all three demonstrated rather than merely planned is what determines whether an IP core is usable by product teams on a reasonable schedule.

Note what this implies architecturally but is not stated: running Linux requires an MMU, privilege modes, and a ratified profile. The release specifies none of them.

What is not disclosed

This is the longer list, and it is where a buyer's real risk sits:

Taken together, these gaps mean MagicV should be treated as an early-availability IP announcement, not a characterised product.

Company context

Micro Magic describes itself as a private, self-funded company providing tools, services, and IP for the design of high-speed, low-power SoCs, and states it is actively exploring strategic partnerships or acquisitions with industry leaders. CEO Mark Santoro is quoted on customer reaction to the power figures; co-founder Lee Tavrow (Ph.D., MIT) on die area, cost, and low-voltage capability.

That last line is worth flagging for anyone considering MagicV for a multi-year programme. IP continuity is a material input to a silicon decision, and it is an open question here.

How to evaluate it

Questions to put to Micro Magic before any design commitment:

  1. Is the 13,000 CoreMark figure measured on silicon, or simulated? Under what compiler and flags?
  2. Is RVV 1.0 supported, at what vector length, and is it compiler-accessible today?
  3. Is there a ratified profile target (RVA22 / RVA23), and a compliance statement?
  4. Are the Linux, Zephyr and FreeRTOS ports mainline, or vendor forks? Are patches public?
  5. What is the deliverable — RTL, hardened macro, or FPGA bitstream — at which foundries and nodes?
  6. Is there a coherency story for the 2-core and 4-core configurations?

What it signals regardless

Whether or not the numbers hold, the direction is clear. Vendors are now competing on performance-per-watt of 64-bit RISC-V at both ends of the curve simultaneously — the 5 GHz ceiling and the 10 mW floor — within one core family. That is a different posture from the earlier phase of the ecosystem, where 64-bit RISC-V meant server-class parts and 32-bit meant microcontrollers, with a largely empty middle.


Sources

  1. ACCESS Newswire — "Micro Magic, Inc. Announces Immediate Availability of the World's Fastest and Lowest Power 64-bit RISC-V Processors" (Sunnyvale, CA, 31 August 2026): https://www.accessnewswire.com/newsroom/en/computers-technology-and-internet/micro-magic-inc.-announces-immediate-availability-of-the-worlds-f-1213665
  2. Micro Magic corporate site: https://www.micromagic.com

Verification notes